As fans reject AI-generated music, even boosters are drawing the line
As fans reject AI-generated music, even boosters are drawing the line

Blake Montgomery Wed, October 21, 2026 at 12:01 PM UTC
0

Grimes, and A$AP Rocky.Composite: Getty images
Streaming services, notable musicians and fans are confronting the growing presence of AI-generated music and drawing lines in the sand.
On Tuesday, Spotify announced it had removed some 50m songs considered AI slop from its recommendations to users over the past year.
āOur editors hold the same standard and donāt program content identified as slop or spam,ā a statement from the company read. Spotify requires āAI personaā badges on artist profiles that donāt represent a real human being, but it does not require individual songs generated by AI to be labeled. Other streaming services have taken more stringent stances.
Though itās cracking down on slop tracks, Spotify is far from AI-shy. The company allows users to create playlists with generative AI and has promised a tool for making AI-generated remixes and cover songs.
Unable to ignore the tide, even early AI boosters like the singer and producer Grimes, former paramour of Elon Musk and mother to three of his 14 children, have declared their limits on allowable amounts of AI. She and other musicians say they are open to AI-generated music but wary.
Fans, by contrast, have little tolerance for it. They are voting with millions of streams against artifice in music. Songs and albums harkening back to analog instrumentation are dominating the Billboard charts, no futurism wanted.
Both A$AP Rocky, rapper and partner to Rihanna, and Grimes have taken the same position: accepting AI-generated music but not making it.
Advertisement
āI prefer to do things myself, practically,ā A$AP Rocky told Billboard: āIf somebody does a totally AI-generated song where all they did was prompt something, then I think thatās their thing. But who am I to say whatās standard and whatās not? Iām just doing me out here, and Iām doing my music practically ā the right way.ā
Kelly Clarkson similarly outlined her own boundary while expressing enthusiasm for AI.
Grimes, one of my own favorite musicians, has begun promoting her first new album in six years, Psy Opera, which she described to the Paris Review as capturing the āemotion of being thrust into the futureā. Stereogum described the album as āAI-inspired but not AI-generatedā, citing Grimesās own insistence that her team of 70 be credited rather than reduced to machines.
Grimes offered a free license of her own voice to AI enthusiasts to make what they would three years ago. That she declined to generate her own music indicates that, even to a futurist like her, AI-generated music is lacking, similar to Rockyās stance.
I have also found myself listening to an AI-generated song, Bomboclat Wallahi, brought to my attention via frenetic, overstimulating videos on Instagram. Despite the songās comical sonic maximalism, it lacks any staying power. Listening to it the day after I first heard it left no impression, similar to the way low-quality food leaves me hungry again just a few hours after eating. āSlopā is still the best word to describe AI-made content.
In contrast with artistsā nuanced stances, fans are making their position on tech-made music clear: they donāt want it. Billboardās charts of the most popular albums and charts of the past week showcase a preference for music without obvious modification. Songs and albums that feature a simple voice-and-guitar arrangement are dominating. On the Top 200 album charts, most of the Top 10 albums foreground a singer over analog instrumentation ā Olivia Rodrigoās you seem pretty sad for a girl so in love, Ella Langleyās Dandelion, Olivia Deanās The Art of Loving, Taylor Swiftās The Life of a Showgirl, Noah Kahanās The Great Divide and Stick Season, and Morgan Wallenās Iām the Problem. In the Hot 100 singles chart, the top four songs bear the same sonic signatures: Swiftās Patient Zero, Langleyās Choosinā Texas, Stella Leftyās Boston, Wallenās Been by Now.
Incredibly, the Beatlesā Rubber Soul, released in 1965, also made an appearance at No 4 on last weekās Billboard rankings. Some listeners want to return to a time when producing music with artificial intelligence wasnāt even an option.
Source: āAOL Entertainmentā